I am new to this forum, so forgive me if this is not the normal type of question, but there's something i've never been able to figure out. I've been doing accounting for over 15 years and i still cannot figure out why most accountants like to look at a trial balance. I always request a BS and P&L and cannot figure out the benefit of the TB. BS and P&L gives the amount in every account, yet also subtotals in a useful. way. total equity - right there. Net income - no problem. Fixed asset cost - just look at the total.
It's been my experience that, whenever i see another accountant with a trial balance, inevitably, they have to net two or more numbers together that would have been totaled for them on a BS or P&L. And it's not like the TB gives any more information. It just doesn't organize it as well.
Not an important question i know, but for those of you (probably most) who like viewing a TB, can you tell me why?
It's been my experience that, whenever i see another accountant with a trial balance, inevitably, they have to net two or more numbers together that would have been totaled for them on a BS or P&L. And it's not like the TB gives any more information. It just doesn't organize it as well.
Not an important question i know, but for those of you (probably most) who like viewing a TB, can you tell me why?