Hello,
I'm currently working on a dissertation about the influence of voluntary disclosure on firm value of belgian listed companies. I am using Tobin's Q as my dependent variable. In prior research, Tobin's Q was defined as the market value of a company devived by its replacement costs of assets. In my research, i am using a different calcutation. I use:
market value of equity + book value of debts
------------------------------------------------------------------------
book value of equity + book value of debts
I was wondering how i can correctly interpretate this formula? I know the interpretation of the normal Tobin's Q but this is definately not the same ofcourse. Why is the market value higher? Why do u guys think Tobin's Q is a good measure for firm value?
Thanks!
I'm currently working on a dissertation about the influence of voluntary disclosure on firm value of belgian listed companies. I am using Tobin's Q as my dependent variable. In prior research, Tobin's Q was defined as the market value of a company devived by its replacement costs of assets. In my research, i am using a different calcutation. I use:
market value of equity + book value of debts
------------------------------------------------------------------------
book value of equity + book value of debts
I was wondering how i can correctly interpretate this formula? I know the interpretation of the normal Tobin's Q but this is definately not the same ofcourse. Why is the market value higher? Why do u guys think Tobin's Q is a good measure for firm value?
Thanks!